Skip to main content
Case study

Market-based cash balance plan design for a physician medical group

2 November 2026

Related Content

The ask: How could a cash balance plan help a medical group’s physicians save for retirement?

A physician-owned medical group sought to enhance its retirement planning strategy while addressing several long-term financial and organizational objectives. The physician group included partners at varying stages of their careers, creating a need for a retirement program that could accommodate diverse savings goals while maintaining cost efficiency and flexibility.

The medical group faced a common challenge among physician practices: balancing the retirement planning needs of a diverse ownership group while maintaining cost control and operational flexibility.

Some physicians wanted to maximize retirement contributions, while others preferred a more moderate level of annual commitment. Leadership needed a solution that would:

  • Provide substantial tax-advantaged retirement savings opportunities
  • Avoid excessive staff benefit costs
  • Support long-term succession and ownership transition planning
  • Offer flexibility for physicians with different financial goals and career timelines

A traditional retirement plan structure would not adequately address these competing priorities.

The solution: A five-tier market-based cash balance plan

The process began with a series of meetings involving senior physician leadership to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a cash balance plan.

Discussions focused on:

  • Retirement savings opportunities for physician partners
  • Cost and funding considerations
  • Potential impact on staff benefits
  • Long-term succession planning objectives

A comprehensive cost–benefit analysis was conducted to evaluate multiple plan design alternatives and determine the most effective path forward. To ensure broad physician understanding and engagement, a town hall meeting was held with the entire physician group.

The educational sessions helped build awareness and support while providing physicians with a clear understanding of how the proposed plan could fit into their personal retirement strategies.

Following the educational meetings, a survey was distributed to gauge physician interest and participation appetite. The survey results were overwhelmingly positive and demonstrated strong physician interest in moving forward with a cash balance plan.

After reviewing various alternatives, the group adopted a physician-only market-based cash balance plan featuring a five-tier contribution structure of flat pay credits. Rather than forcing physicians into a single contribution model, the plan allowed participants to select a contribution tier that aligned with their personal financial goals and cash flow needs. The cash balance plan will be reevaluated every three to five years with the opportunity for physicians to move into different pay credit structures during the reevaluation period.

The five-tier structure provided physicians with meaningful retirement savings opportunities while controlling costs, supporting succession planning objectives, and preserving the flexibility needed to adapt as circumstances evolve. Selecting a market-based plan means that participant account growth is tied to market-based returns. This design can reduce the funding volatility and the mismatch that sometimes occurs in traditional defined benefit or cash balance plans when asset performance differs from fixed interest crediting rates. The result was a retirement strategy capable of serving both current physician partners and future generations of practice leadership.

The outcome: Tax-advantaged savings for physician-owners with a market-based cash balance plan

The market-based cash balance plan gave the medical group a more strategic and flexible retirement program than a traditional one-size-fits-all design. Physician-owners gained access to meaningful tax-advantaged savings opportunities tailored to their individual needs, while leadership maintained control over overall plan cost and staff benefit obligations, all while being in compliance with non-discrimination rules.

The final design also complemented the group’s broader business objectives by supporting ownership transition planning, improving partner satisfaction, and creating a retirement framework capable of evolving with the practice over time.


About the Author(s)

We’re here to help