The end of 2017 saw the passage of significant tax reform in Congress. With this tax reform, the corporate tax rate has dropped from 35% to 21%, generating quite a bit of attention due to the significant savings that will result for corporations. One relatively unpublicized result has been the additional funding of cash contributions to corporate defined benefit plans.While contributions made for the 2018 plan year will generally be deducted at the new lower corporate tax rate of 21%, contributions for the 2017 plan year will generally be deducted at the higher rate of 35%. For many corporations with underfunded pension plans, contributing additional dollars or accelerating already planned contributions will generate a net tax savings because underfunded plans are expected to eventually require additional contributions.
More and more, the plan sponsors are issuing corporate debt to make additional pension contributions. For example, General Electric recently announced that it was making a discretionary contribution of $6 billion into its pension plan funded through debt.
In addition to recent tax reform, here are three other reasons we are seeing this trend on the rise:
1. Skyrocketing Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) premiums. The variable rate premium that corporations pay on underfunded liabilities has increased from 3.4% of the underfunding in 2017 to 3.8% in 2018 (and 4.2% in 2019, as listed in the PBGC website). Any contribution in 2018 to the pension plan immediately reduces the PBGC premium by 3.8% in 2018 (and more in future years). Additionally, that money would then be invested and anticipated to grow with the plan's expected return (say 6.25%). This leads to an effective return on capital of 10.29% in 2018 (and 10.71% in 2019), and higher returns are anticipated in future years.
2. Updated mortality will drive PBGC liabilities higher by approximately 4%, leading to significant increases in the variable rate contribution.
3. Corporate interest rates remain low and corporations are able to borrow at relatively low costs.
For the purpose of example, let's look at a theoretical additional contribution of $10 million into an underfunded pension plan. This additional contribution would:
Reduce fees paid to the PBGC by $380,000 in 2018 (and $420,000 in 2019, and growing in following years)
Be invested in the trust, and therefore would be anticipated to grow by a company's expected return on assets in 2018 (likely 5% to 7%, which translates to $500,000 to $700,000 on a full-year basis)
Reduce the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) accounting expense in 2018 and beyond (by an amount similar to investments in the trust, depending on timing) to the extent these contributions were anticipated at the beginning of the fiscal year
Be tax-deductible at the 2017 corporate tax rates because any contribution before September 15, 2018, can count as a 2017 plan year contribution for calendar-year plans
However, there are some limitations:
While plans that are fully funded on a PBGC basis will not see additional PBGC savings, they will see the additional tax and expense savings as outlined above
Because of the structure of the PBGC variable rate premium, additional contributions to plans at the PBGC variable premium cap (due to head count) may not share the PBGC advantages, but will see the additional tax and expense savings as outlined above
With tax reform now in place, many corporations are poised to take advantage of opportunities to improve the financial status of their defined benefit retirement plans. Acting sooner rather than later on this opportunity will enable them to stabilize and move their plans more firmly into the black.